Comments on: Cummins 6.7l EGR & DPF "DO NOT REMOVE" under penalty of…

By: phil bob

phil bob — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:21:56 +0000

My truck i do what i want …. if its bad for my motor its coming off. Ive had a 6.7 cummins for 4 years and screw inspection stickers havent been pulled over once for it.

By: phil bob

phil bob — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:15:16 +0000

dpf/ cat/ egr delete nuff said better mpg/ longer engine lift, cleaner oil, less stress on the motor. less heat to tear down the motor.. Cooler coolant temp once your remove the egr cooler

By: Tom

Tom — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:12:53 +0000

Is there a system to change a 6.7 to urea injection like GM and Ford are now doing. If not then why not.

By: MYCARLADY

MYCARLADY — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:19:58 +0000

Interesting response but since we have had several complaints in Canada, and as of this date, no class-action lawsuit, while the USA has over 10k complaints and a growing lawsuit waiting for the judge to make a decision on Chrysler’s appeal…
I think the continued availability of owner’s posts and recommendations shared with others… is extremely relevent today.

By: jason

jason — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 04:12:39 +0000

THIS IS DATED INFO, HERE IN CANADA THE DODGE DEALERSHIPS THEMSELVES ARE DOING THIS MODS. THEY USUALLY USE SMARTY TUNERS (AN UNAPPROVED PROGRAMMER) AND THEY ARE SEEING NOTHING BY SUBSTANTIAL FUEL ECONOMY GAINS AND IMPROVED RELIABILITY FROM THIS ENGINE. AS FAR AS WARRANTY IS CONCERNED, ANY FAILURE THAT IS QUESTIONED HAS TO BE PROVEN AS A RESULT OF THESE MODIFICATIONS. THAT’S FROM THE SERVICE MANAGER HIMSELF. HE EVEN WENT AS FAR AS TO SAY ‘IF YOU COME IN WITH A BLOWN U-JOINT, WE’RE NOT GOING TO SAY IT ISN’T COVERED BECAUSE YOUR EGR AND DPF HAVE BEEN REMOVED. IF FOUND THIS FUNNY CONSIDERING HE IS WELL AWARE THAT THE PERFORMANCE PROGRAMMER/TUNER IS USED TO FOOL THE COMPUTER..LOL. THERE ARE MOPAR MECHANICS THAT WILL TELL YOU THAT THESE MODS WILL DO NOTHING BUT BENEFIT YOUR MOTOR, WHEN DONE PROPERLY.

By: mike

mike — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:55:57 +0000

HOW CAN I NOT LET TRUCK IDLE WHEN I HAVE TO SIT IN TRAFFIC SO WHAT THIS IS SAYING IS THIS TRUCK SHOULDENT BE SOLD IN ANY STATE WITH STOPLIGHTS OR TRAFFIC F##&IN RETARDS THEY SHOULD BE HIT IN HEAD WITH A HAMMER

By: mike

mike — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:46:14 +0000

i have a 2008 cummins 6.7 bought it new its been in 39 times in 39000 miles all for emissions what a p.o.s. i will never buy another Christler product and how can i sell it and give these problems to someone else in good conchence i will prob delete everything i figure if no check engine light i dont need warranty its realy only a warranteed peice of SHIT CHRYSTLER SUCKS

By: Shane

Shane — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:14:15 +0000

I blocked my EGR and put a full turbo back exhaust on my 6.7. No cat, Nox, dpf. Now it runs like it should. Screw the EPA, CARB, and all that political BS.

By: nelson

nelson — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:44:48 +0000

Simple wag the dog scenario. Ethanol is the same thing, cleaner burning but takes the same amount of fossil fuel to make it. Now it’s a cleaner diesel exhaust that burns 40% more fuel for the same task. THE DIFFERENCE DOES NOT COMPUTE! Unless you are a politician up for re-election.

By: carey

carey — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:58:20 +0000

is it worth “lowering emissions” when you have to sacrafice 8 to 9 MPG to do so. I don’t think anybody that accually owns and drives the “new clean diesel” has done any research on how much fuel is lost to lower poluttion, when adding more fuel consumption are you really helping the situation? think about it.